Groups vow to fight travel ban and other "racist policies" of Trump Administration

BALTIMORE - Representatives of several immigrant rights and social rights groups held a press event at the Maryland Office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations to condemn the recent Supreme Court ruling upholding President Donald Trump’s Administration’s ban on travel from several predominantly Muslim countries, vowing to continue their fight against what they see as prejudicial policies.

“It is deeply disappointing that the highest level of our judiciary has decided to allow this administration to target Muslims, empowering this President and future administrations to discriminate on the basis of religion,” said Zainab Chaudry, the spokeswoman and Director of Maryland Outreach for CAIR. “Yesterday’s decision undermines Muslim communities and opens the door to state-sanctioned discrimination toward minority groups. This shameful decision enforces the Trump administrations increasingly aggressive, Islamophobic, anti-immigrant agenda. It joins the ranks of other deplorable Supreme Court Rulings in history, such as the Dred Scott case, which denied citizenship to African Americans, and Korematsu, which green-lighted Japanese internment camps, an extremely shameful and regrettable chapter in our country's history.”

The 5-to-4 decision, divided along the court’s party lines, maintains the travel restrictions are within the president’s executive jurisdiction, and that his remarks on the campaign trail that spoke to a potential religious or ethnic animus behind the policy did not preclude such executive authority.

“The Supreme Court is on the wrong side of history, but they’ve been on the wrong side of history before,” said Dana Vickers Shelley, the Executive Director of the ACLU of Maryland. “It is so unfortunate that they are allowing, by their decision, official racism, religious intolerance, and xenophobia to continue rather than standing up to it.” 

Rizwan Siddiqi, President of the United Maryland Muslim Council, urged Governor Larry Hogan to make a statement against the ban. 

“As an American I am absolutely horrified by this administrations reliance on trumped national security concerns to justify all manner of cruelty, race-based religious persecution at the border,” Bobbie Monahan, of Indivisible Baltimore, said in reference to the administration’s claims that the new travel policy, and the recent controversy surrounding children being separated from their parents at the country’s southern border, are validated by an overwhelming national security concern.

Aban Jones, a young man who immigrated from the African nation of Chad, a country on one of the first iterations of the travel ban, spoke of the pride he felt in graduating high school, and the sadness his family experienced when his grandmother, a Chadian national, could not come to the U.S. to attend his commencement ceremony.

Howard County Councilman Calvin Ball added a historical perspective in his remarks, speaking about children reading history books in school, and what those future history books might say about our current times if policies like these persist. 

“What we see right now is not the right thing. Tearing families apart; banning people based on their religion; it’s not the right thing,” Ball said. “Those of us that think that we are not the targets, we may just have to wait and see.”

Also conjuring history, Naveed Ahmed of the Islamic Circle of North America, introduced a campaign in support of U.S. House Resolution 869, which recognizes the contributions of American Muslim’s to the history of the country. He compared the Islamic communities ties to the nation’s growth with those of other celebrated ethnic groups like Italians and Irish. 

“There is a strong need for education in our community, on American-Muslim roots. We have been present in this country before and after it’s revolution,” Ahmed said. “The resolution proudly describes how Muslims are knotted to the American fabric before and since the founding of the nation.”

The overwhelming message from the press conference was that these impassioned groups will not let this Supreme Court decision be the end of their fight. They vowed to remain ardent advocates for the oppressed.

“We’re going to keep going in the courts; we’re going to keep going in the streets,” said Nick Katz, the Senior Manager of Legal Services for CASA de Maryland, the state’s largest immigrant rights organization. “We’re going to keep going everywhere we can to make sure we stand against the racist policies of this administration.”

Print this article Back to Top